Qu'est-ce que le Sahaj Marg ? Approche d'un concept évolutif

dimanche 9 mars 2008

Lettre ouverte à Navneet Kumar Saxena

(Dernière actualisation : 16 mai 2008)

Cette lettre ouverte anonyme a été publiée initialement le 8 mai 2008 sur le blog de 4d-Don, en commentaire de "Chari is Angry with Supreme court Judgement". Elle est adressée à Navneet Kumar Saxena, fils de Umesh Chandra Saxena et petit-fils de Babuji.

Cette lettre est restée sans réponse à ce jour...


OPEN LETTER TO NAVNEET KUMAR SAXENA

Dear Navneet,

fine, that you are healthy and “in station” again. So, maybe, we can ask you some questions (or repeat some unanswered questions).

1. Y O U R D E C I S I O N IN ANSWER TO THE JUDGEMENT CONCERNING CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6619 OF 2000 (Supreme Court) should be given to the public. The Court decided that the decision of case of 2007 has to be done latest in 6 months. Will you take any legal activities of a so-called interim protection?

If you do, of what type will they be?

[The judgement of the Supreme Court for the case of the year 2000 says
“.....So far as ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 7359 OF 1989 is concerned, the findings recorded in the judgment therein could have constituted res judicata but the fact remains that the appellate court permitted the WITHDRAWAL OF THE SUIT and once the suit has been permitted to be WITHDRAWN all the proceedings taken therein including the judgment passed by the trial court have been wiped out. A judgment given in a suit which has been permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty of filing a fresh suit on the same cause of action CANNOT CONSTITUTE RES JUDICATE IN A SUBSEQUENT SUIT FILED PURSUANT to such permission of the court.

.... It would be appropriate to direct that THE PENDING SUIT [02/2007 HIGH COURT] shall be decided within a period of six months...

...It is open to the parties to move for such INTERIM PROTECTION ....”]

2. NAVNEET, WHAT ARE YOUR INTENTIONS?

For example, for what did you need comments from other blogs? Why did you ask on http://4d-don.blogspot.com/ for posting comments from there to your blog? (What is this policy of shifting comments from one blog to another blog? Are people asked if they agree with the shift? If not, is this honest? Didn’t you learn during study, not to make any quotations without giving the sourse of the quotation?

[From: http://4d-don.blogspot.com/ on March 25, 2007 10:19:00 PDT PM/“Navneet said:”enter comments into new Blog Address as below http://srcmshahjahanpur.blogspot.com/ I have lost comments from 124 onwards if people who have posted can re-post your welcome.”

On http://srcmshahjahanpur.blogspot.com/ Posted by Navneet at 10:03 PM 1 comments/ comment 1: 4d-Don said... “Hi Navneet........ “( now comments of many bloggers are encluded in this comment 1)]. Is there any SPIRITUAL reason in this?

3.Why are you looking for “supporters” and thinking about the “ (support) of a good n u m b e r of people”?

Did you unterstand the comment “....I GUESS SERIOUS SPIRITUAL SEEKERS SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM S R C M ... OF SHAJAHANPUR ...... SO PLZ STOP ALL THIS!” correctly?

[From: http://tmtindia.blogspot.com/2007/01/justice-should-be-for-all-not-only-for.html/
N a v n e e t /sandeep said.., an inactive abhayase of SRCMtm (not SRCM?)]

4. Do YOU know about A H I M S A or KNOW ALL PEOPLE AS YOUR BROTHERS AND TREAT THEM AS SUCH (Or less spiritual: prohibition on vigilantism)?

And what happened to a person who was beaten up in the past by your people, W H E R E I S H E N O W ?

[N a v n e e t K u m a r: “....After about 3 to 4 months Sh. Jahangirdhar also died on the spot at his residence soon after he was given pills in name of medicine by an individual. the individual was beaten in closed room and asked who was behind it he said I can't name him otherwise he will kill me, T O O . Now I am not saying who is behind it and what was the benefit he could have got...”
A B: “Mr. Navneet Kumar, I am able to imagine what happened in this “closed room”. Can you explain if this is the practical application of your spiritual theory in life?

N a v n e e t K u m a r: “I just narrated the incident which took place and by the person who was involved in questioning the gentleman who was the tool to Sh. Jahangirdar ji’s death. Moreover, just to bring to your notice that Sh. Jehangirdar ji did tell my father 3-4 months before his death that he knows that he will also die, like Babuji died and that was the reason that he gave the last letter of Babuji to my father during his visit to Shahjahanpur.”]

NOW WE ARE JUST QUESTIONING THE GENTLEMAN WHO IS INVOLVED IN THIS LEGAL BATTLE AS LONG AS HE IS IN STATION NOW.

5. For what was BABUJI’S NEED TO TAKE CARE OF HIS TRANSMISSION when (like others, too, do) he believed that he will never die?

["I have descended on this earth as a living person. I will go back as a l i v i n g p e r s o n and the question of my dying does not arise." -- Babuji From: http://www.srcmshahjahanpur.org.in/our_master.html

and

“As far as transmission is concerned, Babuji has taken care of the same before leaving his
physical Body.”

From: http://tmtindia.blogspot.com/2007/01/justice-should-be-for-all-not-only-for.html/ N a v n e e t]

6. Do you wish to draw people’s attention to the fact, that the quotation "...I have never claimed to be a MASTER..it is unfortunate that some people..are addressing me by that term....So in fact, the purpose of my talk is to request all of you to stop addressing me as Master” originated in the time before 1988 (it was first published in 1988), which means about 20 years back?

7. Would you agree, if your grandfather Ram Chandra of Shajahanpur was the - ONLY - GURU OF SRCM, then SRCM wasn‘t created in honor of Ram Chandra of Fategarh and there will be no sucessor in future, too?

[N a v n e e t K u m a r: “I still abide by the everlasting fact that Babuji is the only and the last Guru of Shri Ram Chandra Mission.” ....“Let me clear that we are against the divisions and we still say that Babuji is the oonly GURU and shall remain till the end of this world.”

“The basic concept is that Babuji Maharaj is and shall continue to remain t h e o n l y G u r u till mahapralay ( doom's day ).” --- Lalaji Maharaj in a dream of Babuji
From: http://www.srcmshahjahanpur.org.in/our_master.html/ “Successors & Spiritual Repräsentatives]

8. Do you know, that many (“very normal” people, not so- called special personalities) know the exact time when they will die, that others know that they will be killed? - My question is, HOW LIVED your grandfather his life knowing that there will be an attempt on his life and how did he deal with the question of death?

[A B: “Out of his explanations it seems to me stated, too, that Babuji (the special personality) seemed to be unable to find out W H O tried to make an attempt on his life.”

N a v n e e t K u m a r: Babuji did know that the attempt was being made on his life. His last letter clearly states so too. [The question again is: WHO?] He also predicted his long hospitalization, which also was true as we know that Babuji was in hospital from September soon after coming back from Paris to April 19th 1983 (The day of his Mahasamadhi. Moreover, as pointed by A old abhyasi about my Aunty stating B a b u j i ’s r e q u e s t o f F I R before leaving to Paris also clearly states that Babuji knew what the future had store for him.]

You allow me to tell the story of a well-known man in this context,
the story of the Sufi master Mansoor Hillaj.

It is said that Mansoor al Hillaj’s way to be killed was the worst ever done up to then. First his legs were cut off, then his hands were cut. He was alive. Then his tongue was cut, then his eyes were taken out. He was still alive. He was cut in pieces.
What crime had he done?
He had said, “An’al Haq.” (“I am the Truth. I am God.”)
The Seers of the Upanishads declare, “Aham Brahmasmi.” (“I am the Brahma, the Supreme Self.”)

The people couldn’t tolerante somebody saying this.
It is said when they cut Mansoor in peaces he looked to the sky and prayed to God and said, “You cannot deceive me! I can see you in everybody present here.
You are trying to deceive me? You have come as a the murderer?
I tell you in whatever form you come, I will recognize you, because I have recognized you in myself.”

And I’d like to direct your attention to the following text: “My Master had been seriously ill in the early part of the year 1974, and had to be finally hospitalised in Lucknow, where he lay in deep coma for almost one month. In view of his advanced age - he being 75 years old then - there were deep, though unexpressed, fears that the end may not be long. It was much of a miracle to most of us when he regained consciousness, and then went on to regain health.

It was my privilege to have been with him for part of the time he was hospitalised. I also went to Shahjahanpur after he was discharged from the hospital in Lucknow, and stayed with him for many days till he was relatively in better health, after his month of long ordeal. It was then that he revealed to me that he had chosen me to be his spiritual represantive, to eventually succeed him as the President of the Mission, whenever this became necessary. Those were, for me, very moving days, driving me to tears from moment to moment. Those were the blessed days when his gentle and deeply abiding love flowed upon me, over me, like a spring drizzle under blazing sunshine. Those were also the days of the most personal intimacy between us, when there seemed to be nothing at all between us, exept our two identities. It was as if he had removed all barriers between ourselves, and we were blissfully together in a oneness that would perhaps be difficult to experience later.

It was a time of the greatest happiness for me, and, rather surprisingly, the time of the greatest sorrow for me too, for it was then that I had to face the certain knowledge that one day my beloved would leave me to go into the brighter World. This knowledge almost broke my heart. He could of course divine it at a glance, and he would gently chide me for such thoughts, saying ‘I shall be with you for many more years. Do not worry about it now. Mrs . Davies told me that I shall live till 2006 or 2007, and others have told me the same thing. So don’t cry now. I shall be with you for a long time. One day we all shall have to go. But I repeat, it is very far off.’ Thus he would chide me and comfort me. But nevertheless, I could not bear to think of the time when he would not be with me, and thus began for me the hidden sorrow in my heart, which has never left me, and which, in 1983, became the stark and devastating reality that shall haunt me for the rest of my life. .....” P. Rajagopalachari, Bangalore, 8th March 1989


Nawneet Kumar, I see that you give second-hand informations to the auditory , which - generally - in most cases are unreliable, although there may be some truth in them. And I see, that we speek different languages (see 3.).

About the time of death of your grandfather you said

“My father had gone to America for his treatment, after attending the paris function. He came to know of Babuji’s illness and that he had been taken to hospital. So he cut short his visit returned back, and t h e n r e m a i n e d w i t h B a b u j i t i l l h e w a s i n t h e h o s p i t a l ....”

[First of all: Your father could afford to go for to U. S. for medical Treatment, this in the year 1983. I know Indians (professors, physicians, I don’t speak about poor people) who - in 2008 - say they can’t afford to go to a Western country. And I remember having read somewhere that the father of the same person, Babuji, told, that he couldn’t afford to drink milk, this in the days when the first visitors came to his home. (Somewhere I read that his trips to the West were paid by Western (Danish?) abhyasis.) I am surprised about what you tell here about about a medical treatment of your father. (But this isn’t the most important aspect of the discussion here.] The question is: WHERE was your father when Babuji DIED? WHO was with Babuji when he DIED?

- You never answered these questions.

I have nobody to ask for permission to write on this or any other blog. I can’t agree with the intentions behind SOME BLOGS and some comments. Moreover I don’t believe that the so-called discussions there serve the subject. For you, Navneet, I may say: You may think you serve the interests of your grandfather. It is my strong belief, that you don’t do.

Please, answer our questions before you go out of station again!

Ashrams : la fièvre acheteuse ?

(Dernière actualisation : 7 novembre 2008)

Recherche local commercial 300 m² avec bureaux. Telle est la petite annonce que pourrait passer la SRCM Lyon actuellement. En effet, Ajay Kumar Bhatter a donné son accord au Centre de Lyon pour entamer la recherche d'un ashram.
"Comment construire un Ashram - grâce à l'amour du Maître", tel est le thème du séminaire suisse qui s'est déroulé du 19 au 21 septembre 2008 à Vaumarcus, près de Neuchatel…

Les cadeaux de César

A Lyon, le "cadeau du Maître" va coûter 300 000 € selon les estimations des responsables. Dans sa grande bonté, la SRCM France qui récupère 60 € sur une cotisation de 75 et gère son petit million d'euros de placements financiers prévoit d'en financer la moitié. Aucun financement international n'est prévu. Les abhyasis lyonnais doivent trouver le restant par eux-mêmes : à savoir à peu près 3000 € par personne ! Tel est donc le cadeau de Chari…
A quoi sert la fondation suisse SMSF qui collecte les donations européennes si elle ne participe pas ?
Alors que les travaux de rénovation de l'ashram de Lausanne sont à peu près terminés, alors qu'il est devenu un lieu de vie de plus en plus actif, Chari a décidé de s'en débarrasser pour en faire construire un autre ailleurs. Les abhyasis ont beau ne pas être convaincus, Chari passe outre quitte à dynamiter la dynamique romande et c'est donc "grâce à son amour" que devra se construire ce nouvel ashram. Grâce à l'amour de Chari…

Tels sont les généreux cadeaux de Chari à ses chers abhyasis !

Des transferts de fonds vers l'Inde

A la SRCM de Chari, un ashram c'est a minima un hall de méditation avec un cottage ou un appartement pour Chari. Et le cottage a autant sinon plus d'importance que le hall de méditation, puisque le plus grand espoir des abhyasis est de voir Chari leur rendre visite…
Effectuons un bref retour en arrière sur l'apparition de ces ashrams qui poussent comme des champignons :

1976, Babuji inaugure l'ashram de Shahjahanpur. 30 ans après la création de la SRCM, c'est le premier ashram de la Mission, le seul que créera jamais Babuji. Et encore, c'est en prenant sur ses propres biens familiaux…
Arrive 1988-89, 10 ans plus tard. Babuji est décédé et c'est Chari qui tient les commandes. Changement de stratégie : il a chauffé à blanc ses fidèles occidentaux. S'il veulent le voir revenir, il leur faut un ashram. Ce seront d'abord le château d'Augerans en France et Molena aux USA. Et cela ne semble jamais s'arrêter : Vrads au Danemark, Broomlee en Ecosse, etc.
A nouveau 10 ans plus tard, Chari s'est fait un nom, une renommée en Occident. Il est temps pour lui de songer à rentrer au pays. Cette fois, il saigne les occidentaux pour ses projets indiens. Et en 1999 on inaugure en grandes pompes le Babuji Memorial Ashram (5 ha, un hall de méditation pour 13 000 personnes, 2 à 3 millions de dollars estimés à l'époque). Et les grands ashrams indiens suivent : Bangalore, Tiruppur, Hyderabad, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Delhi, Allahabad, Calcutta et Satkhol. A titre d'exemple, l'ashram d'Ahmedabad s'étend sur 2 hectares, son hall de méditation peut accueillir 2500 personnes, il y a des dortoirs pour 750 personnes et une quinzaine d'appartements…
2005 : Nouveau changement ! On ne finance plus d'ashrams mais une école (la LMOS), des centres de formation (CREST) et des centres de retraite (Panshet, Malampuzha, etc.). Diversification des projets et des investissements, mais c'est toujours en Inde essentiellement que ça se passe. Le transfert des fonds occidentaux vers l'Inde fonctionne à plein régime. Pourquoi changer ?

En clair, Chari a commencé à investir en Europe et aux Etats-Unis, ou plutôt il a fait investir les abhyasis occidentaux chez eux, pour ensuite mieux pouvoir leur demander de financer son quartier général en Inde (le BMA), ainsi que tous ses nouveaux projets…

Au bon vouloir de Chari

Chari s'amuse ! Il joue avec les abhyasis, comme pour tester jusqu'où il ne faut pas aller, sachant qu'on n'a pas encore vu la fin. Ils acceptent tout sans broncher…

En 2003, contre toute attente, il fait revendre le château d'Augerans. Puis les abhyasis australiens doivent revendre leur terrain d'Armadale, près de Perth. Le 16 mai 2006, Chari donne son accord aux Italiens pour leur projet d'ashram, lors de son passage chez eux. Une semaine plus tard, depuis Vrads au Danemark, il annule le projet pour mieux autoriser le 2 juin suivant le projet berlinois. Il dit non au projet londonien et renvoie les abhyasis irlandais et anglais sur Vrads…

Mais Chari ne fait pas que s'amuser ! Si les abhyasis doivent lui demander la permission, ils doivent aussi se débrouiller par eux-mêmes pour le financement. A quoi sert donc la fondation suisse SMSF qui collecte les donations européennes si elle ne participe pas ? Chari (la SMSF) n'a financé que les deux tiers de l'ashram de Berlin. Combien a-t-il mis sur la table pour Milan ? Il refuse de participer financièrement au Royaume-Uni, malgré les 1500 € versés en moyenne par abhyasi ? Et il ne met pas un centime non plus à Lyon quand les abhyasis doivent trouver 3000 € chacun…

Alors, pour que leur projet aboutisse, les responsables du Centre de Lyon ont tout particulièrement soigné leur campagne de communication, en adoptant une stratégie d'évitement des questions financières.
Pour ce faire, ils utilisent les mots de P.R. Krishna, fils de Chari et responsable de la gestion des ashrams dans le monde : un ashram, "il faut le vouloir de tout son cœur. (…) Le problème n'est pas l'argent. Quand le Maître agit, les projets viennent et l'argent est trouvé."
Quand le Maître agit, Chari ne fait rien d'autre que donner son accord via le bout des lèvres d'Ajay pour la recherche d'un ashram. En gros, "allez-y, débrouillez vous". Cela ne signifie pas qu'il acceptera l'achat final, ce genre de revirement s'est déjà vu ! Quant à la SRCM France, elle est beaucoup plus généreuse : du haut de son pactole boursier, elle daigne apporter la moitié du financement, quand elle touche déjà 80% du montant des cotisations de base qui seront doublées l'an prochain…

Un ashram, "il faut le vouloir de tout son cœur". De tout son cœur, vraiment ? Oui, mais surtout de tout son porte-monnaie !
En attendant, "quand le Maître agit", la bourse s'effondre… et les projets sont abandonnés.

Le Comité de travail de la SRCM Shahjahanpur

(Dernière actualisation : 24 octobre 2008)

D'après un document mis en ligne et traduit par Shashwat Pandey, voici quelle serait la composition du Conseil d'administration de la SRCM de Shahjahanpur en date du 8 avril 1990, alors qu'elle etait encore présidée par S.P. Srivastava. On notera que Ragavendra Rao de Raichur arrive en tête de la liste des membres et qu'Umesh Chandra Saxena n'y figure nulle part, contrairement à ses frères. Chari non plus, évidemment...

Office of District administrator city, Shahjahanpur
===================================================

Letter Memo / Reg. legal

Shree Sarvesh Chandra
Joint secretary
Shree Ram Chandra Mission Ashram,
Shahjahanpur
====================
Your request letter dated 2-3-90 was cross-checked. District administrator Bhavlkheda has submitted his verification report dated 8-4-90. Based on that report it is confirmed that president of Shree Ram Chandra Mission is Doctor S.P Shrivastava, Shree V.D. Mahajan is secretary, Shree S.C Saxsena is joint secretary, apart from these, following are the members of the board.

1. Raghvendra Rao
2. P.C Saxsena
3. S.C Kishor
4. D.R Bithal Rao
5. N.R Gupta
6. Paramatma Swaroop
7. V.P Mathur
8. B. M Hewal
9. B . C Saxsena
10. R.D Pawar
11. L.K Sharma
12. M.K Gupta
13. Dr. Lalit Kumar Gupta
14. Rajan Kumar
15. Vasudev Singh
16. ChandraShekhar
17. Mrs. Ramakochar
18. M.D Jahangirdar
19. Naseeb Chandra
20. R. Ramchandra Reddy
21. Dr. S.B Shyam
22. Kantilal
23. Ramayati
24. R.B Mathur
25. Mrs. Manbhagwati Devi

Verification officer has also confirmed that above committee is taking care of everyday work of Shree Ram Chandra Mission.

Tasildar Sadar
Shahjahnpur


Source : Shashwat Pandey, Document original et traduction

Très sombre année 1982 pour le Sahaj Marg

(Dernière actualisation le 3 septembre 2009)

Si l'on en croit les derniers documents publiés par Shashwat Pandey, Babuji écrit un courrier incendiaire à Chari le 6 avril 1982 auquel ce dernier répond le 12 avril. D'après Navneet Kumar Saxena, Babuji aurait ensuite rédigé une lettre de nomination de son fils Umesh Chandra le 16 avril suivant. Mais ce n'est que le 28 juin qu'il nomme S.A. Sarnad secrétaire de la Mission en lieu et place de Chari, d'après Shashwat…
Puis le 2 septembre, d'après Navneet, il écrit à MD Jahagirdar que Chari dérive de l'enseignement initial, qu'il se présente illégitimement comme son successeur et qu'il a tenté de l'empoisonner à plusieurs reprises depuis 4 ans, mais qu'il a trouvé son successeur. Il ne le nomme pas mais annonce aussi qu'il devra être accompagné par Srivastava, Narayana et Kashi Ram Agarwal ainsi que Nasib Chand.

Rappelons auparavant le contexte général. En 1981, les seniors précepteurs Raghavendra Rao et Ramachandra Reddy entament une tournée non officielle aux USA avec Umeshchandra Saxena, un fils de Babuji qui n'est même pas précepteur. Tout est devenu très sombre en 1982 lors du voyage de Babuji en France. André Poray est partout en avant de la scène, Chari qui n'a pas été invité est relégué en coulisses. Babuji est très malade.

Shashwat Pandey ne nous fournit pas le contenu de la lettre de Babuji à Chari, mais la réponse de ce dernier (à lire ici). Chari cite Babuji : "something more is needed on your part, and you are aware of it." Et il lui demande pardon pour ses échecs et erreurs tout en l'assurant de son amour et de sa volonté de bien faire…

Chari aurait joué au larbin bien intentionné… mais Babuji avait-il encore toute sa tête ?

En voici une transcription APPROXIMATIVE, le document n'étant pas toujours bien lisible et mon anglais limité(merci à ceux qui pourront me corriger) :

12th April 82

My Beloved Master,
May you live long. Your presence on this world is of
utmost essentiality for the welfare of humanity.
I am grateful for your affectionate letter of the 6th
April under ref: No.1739. I have been pondering over what to
reply, because it is not easy to understand all that you have
written. All that I am able to understand is that you expect
from me something that is now lacking. You have written that
"something more is needed on your part, and you are aware of it."
I am aware that there are very many things that are needed on my
part. The difficulty is to know what. I would be most grateful if
you would kindly elaborate and give me more detailed comments.
I have been trying to come up to your expectations, but
it is obvious that I have so far failed. From your last sentence
it is clear that "glittering in the heart" is also not there, which
you want.
I have made you my goal. If there is anything that I
want to achieve, it is to become like you in everything. Of course
I am convinced that this can be possible only if you want this to
be achieved. I am not trying to make any excuses. I have not tried
hard enough - that is clear from what you now write. It has now
plunged me into despair.
I am conscious that I have not deserved even a fraction
of the love and grace that you have poured upon me all these 18
years that I have been at your holy feet. All that I now want in is
that by your Benevolent Grace, a day may dawn when you may call
me affectionately to your side, and say "Parthasarathi, you have
today deserved all that I have been giving you all these years.
Now proceed on with the work, and go ahead!"
Mistakes I have been making all my life. I have even
been guilty of disrespect towards your Divine and Holy SXXf on
not a few occasions. I beg your pardon for all my unthinking
failures and mistakes, and pray to you to rectify and correct all
the faults in me, and make of me what you will.
With Pranams, and love,
Your affectionately,
Parthasarathi

Deux trois petites choses qu'il n'est pas inutile de rappeler

Navneet Kumar Saxena et Shashwat Pandey ne sont pas des adorateurs de Chari, loin de là. Le premier a accusé Chari d'avoir produit un faux document en 1974, l'inverse peut être vrai pour ces documents soi-disant écrits en 1982.

Cyrille, dans la nébuleuse des full précepteurs nommés par Babuji, rapporte qu'aucun des fils de Babuji ne participait aux satsangs, au grand désespoir des abhyasis indiens et occidentaux. Comment se fait-il donc que Babuji ait décidé de nommer l'un de ses fils et de destituer Chari ?

Michael, qui ne peut être considéré lui-même comme un admirateur de Chari, présent en France en septembre 1982, témoigne que Babuji était malade et délirait. Il ajoute que tout document signé par Babuji à cette époque a peu de crédibilité :

Paris 1982

I attended the Paris 1982 gathering. My observation is that, at that time there were those who supported Chari and those who opposed him. Andre Poray was on the side that opposed Chari. There was no doubt in my mind that this gathering was an attempt to divert western attention away from Chari. Chari was explicitly not invited to the gathering, however, somehow, he managed to be there. I was told that this was because Babuji demanded Chari’s presence there. This may or may not be true, as Chari may simply have shown up on his own accord. Chari was in a room next to Babuji's, which adds credence to the theory that Babuji wanted him there. Members of Chari’s opposition attempted to attend to Babuji keeping Chari as far away as possible. I spent many an hour in Chari's room and witnessed Babuji's attendees sheepishly requesting Chari’s presence in Babujis room due to Babuji’s request.

I also witnessed that Babuji was sick and delirious. Attendees would drive him to the meditation hall, and carry him into the hall, this effort requiring two large men to carry out. He would black out and fall on his knees if he tried to walk. It was as if they were carrying a corpse into the hall for all to see. Any letter written by Babuji at this time in this state, is questionable, especially such a long letter as the one on the Umesh Clan website. In my opinion, any official documents signed by Babuji during this time frame has little credibility.

Chari on the other hand was also aggressively keeping himself in the public eye. He played the role of the man in exile, holding court in his small room, inviting friendly disciples to mediate with him. It was a very effective bit of drama as he knew that people like myself would see his opposition attempt to attend to Babuji in a western country, while Babuji had come accustomed to Chari serving this role. Babuji's constant calls for Chari were embarrassing I'm sure to Chari’s opposition.

As for the references to the doctor attending to Babuji. I spoke with the Doctor at length just after Babuji left. He was a German doctor who practiced both homeopathic and conventional, allopathic medicine. No mention of treachery. His story was that Babuji was far too sick to travel to the west and should never had made the trip. He felt that the trip to Paris would likely be the death of Babuji. Given that Babuji never fully recovered from this trip, his words have the most credibility of all other claims.

Source : Website de Michael le 24/02/2007

Restons prudents !



Source : website de Shashwat Pandey (Proofs… point 6)

Voir aussi Documents officiels ?